CE Courses / Assessment, Amplification, and Audiologic Rehabilitation

List View
Grid View
1 Products

New!
New Horizons in Hearing Health Care Assessment Procedures: Preliminary Results
Format(s): SIG Perspectives
Although there are extensive resources in ways to assess hearing loss and outcomes of hearing intervention in children and adults, research is needed to be more innovative to assess hearing health care in a multifaceted way. The first article in this SIG 7 activity includes information about a new pediatric speech in noise screener Hearing Assessment in Response to Noise Screener (HeARS) that can be used as an app. School-age children spend a significant amount of time in noisy listening environments and research has demonstrated that background noise can have a detrimental effect on speech-language as well as academic performance. This is even more prominent in children with hearing loss. Having said that, there are not many ways to evaluate speech understanding in noise performance for these children. This article discusses the preliminary results of using this app on children aged 4 to 14 years. The test allows assessing children’s ability to understand speech in presence of noise in varying signal to noise ratios (SNR) conditions. Their study concludes that this test is acceptable to use in children and can accurately demonstrate increasing difficulty in speech understanding with decreasing SNR. This test has the potential to be used by clinicians in making audiology assessment more accessible. Next, the second article includes information on quality-of-life outcomes after cochlear implantation. Although cochlear implants have been shown to improve quality of life, these quality-of-life changes can be perceived differently by the implant recipient and their communication partners. This article discusses the preliminary results of a case study that explored general and hearing related quality of life changes after implantation, as perceived by the recipients and their frequent communication partners. Their study concludes that although results for both groups were comparable, there was low agreement in the disease-specific quality of life change ratings. This suggests the importance of better communication between recipients and their partners and the importance of including communication partners in hearing health care.

You have added this item to your cart.